Text
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
Reasons
The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) from March 2, 2005 to November 8, 2006, the Defendant was running credit business with the name of “E” in the “Dphilosolosophical Center” operated by the Defendant, and (b) on January 1, 2006, the Defendant did not pay KRW 100,000 out of KRW 197,50,000 borrowed from the victim G (name H) with the introduction of “E” (name H), and did not repay the remainder of KRW 97,50,000,000; and (c) on January 21, 2008, the Defendant filed an application with the Daegu District Court for the prohibition of disposal of real estate with the Defendant’s claim amounting to KRW 97,52,000,00 with the loans borrowed from the victim G (name H); and (d) on January 21, 2008, the Defendant filed a claim for the return of the loan and provisional disposition with the Defendant.
Accordingly, the Defendant had attempted to take property profits that are exempt from the above loan debt by threatening the victim through the use of hidden circumstances against her husband, who remarriedd the fact that the victim lent money as in this case and received interest from the son and paid it to her children.
Accordingly, on February 208, the Defendant told F to the effect that “I will resolve this within the future,” the Defendant made a phone call to the victim in the philosophical hall and found the victim in the vicinity of the apartment house in which the victim resides, and that “I would report the fact that I received the objection to the tax office and inform the current husband of the fact that I would like to see the fact that I would like to know the fact that I would like to see the former husband.”
Accordingly, the Defendant, on March 6, 2008, has the victim drinking, receive the loan certificate of KRW 50,000,000, which stated the amount of the loan with the above unpaid amount of KRW 97,50,000.