logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2011.01.12 2010구합36893
군인상이연금지급거부결정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 16, 1971, the Plaintiff graduated from the Korea Army Academy at Armed Forces, and served as a guard at the Bussle of the KAF at the KAF at the KAF at the KAF at the KAF at the KAF at the KAF at the KA. On August 31, 1994 (amended to the KAF at the KAF at the KAF at the KAF at the KAF at the KAF at the KAF at the KAF, and was in charge of mental education for the reserve forces on May 1, 1987, the KAF at the SAF at the KAF at the KAF at the KAF at the KAF at the KAF at the KAF at the KAF at the KA, and

B. On March 31, 198, the Plaintiff discharged from active service on March 31, 198, and applied for registration of a person of distinguished service to the head of the Seoul Southern Veterans Branch on March 29, 2002. However, the head of the Seoul Southern Veterans Branch refused the above application on the ground that there is no evidence to prove that the Plaintiff’s present soldier was incurred during his duty or education and training after deliberation and resolution by the Merit Reward Judgment Committee on January 29, 2003.

C. Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking revocation of the non-existence of a person who rendered distinguished service to the State as Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2003Guhap30057, but appealed on May 13, 2004 as Seoul High Court Decision 2004Nu11284, and on July 7, 2005, the Seoul Southern Branch Office rendered a judgment that "the head of the Seoul Southern Branch Office revoked the equivalent decision to the person who rendered distinguished service to the State who rendered distinguished service to the Plaintiff on January 29, 2003," and the head of the Seoul Southern Branch Office appealed as the Supreme Court Decision 2005Du9200 on October 14, 2005 (hereinafter "the judgment of this case").

On December 24, 2009, the plaintiff filed a claim for a wounded veterans' pension with the defendant. On December 24, 2009, the defendant paid a wounded veterans' pension under the Military Pension Act to the plaintiff on December 24, 2009 when he retires due to a disease or injury caused by official duty. The plaintiff is not a person eligible for a wounded veterans' pension, and even if the plaintiff is a person eligible for a wounded veterans' pension, the plaintiff's right to claim a wounded veterans' pension has not

arrow