logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.04.26 2016고정179
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 15, 2016, the Defendant driven a freight vehicle B owned by the Defendant during the license suspension period (from January 10, 2016 to February 18, 2016) with approximately KRW 7 km in front of the Cwho-dong in the same City/Do on the roads adjacent to the west-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si.

2. The defendant of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation shall be a person who has the substantial operational profit of the above B B B B-going vehicle, and no person shall operate any motor vehicle which is not mandatory insurance except for motor vehicles prescribed by Presidential Decree;

Nevertheless, the defendant was driving the B Poter Cargo Vehicles owned by the defendant who did not purchase mandatory insurance at the temporary location of the above paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Details of disposition of driver license suspension;

1. Investigation report (verification, such as public notice of decision to suspend driving licenses);

1. A copy of the public notice on disposition of driver license suspension;

1. In order to inquire into information not covered by mandatory insurance (Article 93(3) of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act, the Commissioner General of the National Police Agency or the head of a local police station shall, when he/she decides to suspend or revoke a driver's license pursuant to Article 93 of the Road Traffic Act, send or issue a notice of decision on the suspension or revocation of a driver's license in attached Form 82 to

Provided, That if it is impossible to give notice to a person subject to the disposition due to his/her unknown whereabouts, such notice may be substituted by publicly announcing it for 14 days on the bulletin board of the police officer having jurisdiction over the domicile of the person subject to the driver'

“.....”

According to the records, the notice sent to the defendant was decided to revoke the driver's license as of December 1, 2015, and the notice was served on the defendant, but it was impossible to serve the notice, and the notice was issued, it can be acknowledged that the notice was given during the period from January 4, 2016 to January 17, 2016 pursuant to Article 93 (3) of the Enforcement Rule.

arrow