logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.04.17 2012구합19953
장애등급결정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. After having undergone a traffic accident on November 7, 2008 (hereinafter “traffic accident in this case”), the Plaintiff received a written disability diagnosis from the New Year’s School Symnae Hospital from December 26, 2008 with mental and medical treatment, and applied for disability registration to the Defendant on August 26, 201 after having received a disability diagnosis from an illness under the name of the disease. However, on September 7, 2011, the Defendant stated the ICD-10 diagnosis guidelines that “the mental disorder in the disability grade standard falls under F20 divided disease, F25 divided disorder, F3 dynamic disorder disorder, F3 dynamic disorder disorder, F33 phomatic disorder, and F33 repeated disorder.” In addition, the Plaintiff’s disability grade is not deemed to fall under the Plaintiff’s disability grade based on the ICD-10 diagnosis guidelines, and the Plaintiff’s mental disorder is not deemed to fall under the Plaintiff’s disability grade standard, i.e., the degree of disability grade and surgery surgery disorder.

B. On November 29, 2011, the Plaintiff received a written disability examination from the same hospital with the name of “a major depression disorder (F33.9)” and applied for re-registration of the disability to the Defendant on February 10, 2012, but the Defendant decided on February 22, 2012 as well as notified that the Plaintiff’s disability grade falls under the category other than the Plaintiff’s disability grade according to the results of the examination by the National Pension Service as above.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

On April 17, 2012, the Plaintiff appealed, and filed an objection on April 17, 2012. The Defendant reviewed the disability diagnosis report and medical record records submitted on May 8, 2012, and reviewed them. As a result, the Plaintiff was accompanied by post-accidents, hair, memory degradation, apprehension, depression, etc. after the traffic accident occurred in 2008, and is under treatment due to post-accident stress disorder diagnosis.

arrow