The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

1. The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases. Thus, this is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance is "road patrol supplementary services" in the 7th part of the judgment of the court of first instance.

The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be from 9 to 11 as follows.

“. The Plaintiff entered into a contract for road patrol and security services with the Defendant on December 21, 2015, with respect to the instant patrol services, with the term of contract of KRW 2,715,00,000 (excluding value-added tax) and the term of contract from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017. The contract amount of KRW 2,845,759,000 (excluding value-added tax) on December 27, 2017 was modified as the contract amount of KRW 2,845,759,00 (excluding value-added tax) and the contract period from January 1, 2016 to January 31, 2018 (hereinafter “instant contract”).

.Article 2 of the first instance judgment of "No. 3-1" is added to "No. 3-1 of the evidence" in Part 19 of the second instance judgment of "A".

The third part of the judgment of the court of first instance is referred to as "misunderstanding" in the 10th part of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.