The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was a public official of Grade 10 in technical service at the Korea Railroad Corporation around May 2002, but has been converted to the employee of the Korea Railroad Corporation since 2005 as the Korea Railroad Corporation was established.

B. On May 10, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a petition with the Defendant with the following content:

(hereinafter “instant petition”). On May 2002, the Plaintiff was appointed as a class 10 series of traffic service as a class of the Korea Railroad Service’s function. Since then, in 2004, the Korea Railroad Service converted to the Korea Railroad Corporation (hereinafter “the instant construction”) and served in the instant construction, the Plaintiff was subject to the following discrimination from the instant construction.

On May 30, 200, the instant corporation appointed 63 persons from 200 to 47 May 2002 for 110 persons who passed the public bonds examination of class 10 service personnel, which was implemented after the decision on the unconstitutionality of the additional points of discharged soldiers, and appointed 110 persons who passed the public bonds examination of class 10 service personnel. During that process, the Plaintiff was appointed on May 200 after passing the examination, as it did not first appoint military workers.

In 2004, the role of the KR was converted to that of the NA as of the end of the 2004, and the 10th class 6th class of the NA was converted to that of the NA, and the collective agreement was concluded that only the career exceeding five years of work experience of the NA was concluded, and it was not recognized for about three

The promotion system for continuous service from Grade 5 to Grade 4 was abolished in October 2015, and the plaintiff was above-mentioned.

Due to the non-recognition of the career of the subsection, the promotion for continuous service scheduled on December 1, 2015 remains approximately two months and was not promoted to Grade IV.

On March 19, 2019, the Defendant rendered a decision to dismiss the instant petition as follows (hereinafter “instant decision”).

The petition filed for a thickness has been decided to be dismissed in accordance with Article 32(1)4 of the National Human Rights Commission of Korea Act because it falls under the real case after one year or more from the date on which the fact causing the petition occurred.

On June 20, 2019, the Plaintiff is subject to the National Human Rights Commission of Korea.