(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2013.04.04 2012고정526

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2013.04.04 2012고정526

상해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 6, 2012, the Defendant was issued a decision to pay C the costs of lawsuit to the obligee C in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch of 2012TTTT 651 and the collection order, but did not pay C the costs of lawsuit.

At around 14:30 on May 4, 2012, in order to enforce a compulsory execution against the defendant's property, the creditor C and two enforcement officers, witness E (the age of 43), and victim E (the age of 43) were found together in the defendant's residence located in Guro-si, Sinsi, and the victim was able to live equally and promptly, and the victim was able to see the 14 days after the treatment date due to the breath's hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant (the third court date);

1. Each statement of witness E and F;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes attached to a criminal investigation report (the filing of photographs taken on the upper parts of a victim) and photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties.

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted as to the assertion of the Defendant and defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that, first, the victim only pushed the victim once, batd and fatd with fats, and fatd with fats, and did not bat off with bats, and that the victim’s bat constitutes self-defense.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the victim consistently stated from the investigative agency to this court that the defendant was sprinking the victim's breath with sphere by hand, and the witness F from the investigative agency to this court consistently with the defendant's f and the execution officer in his f where he was spherbling the victim's sphere, and thereby, the victim's sphere and sphere the victim's sphere.

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2013.08.21 2013노634

-대구지방법원 2014.04.10 2013노3236 (1)

-전주지방법원 2018.03.29 2017노1718

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.04.10 2014고정970

-대구지방법원 2014.07.18 2014노203