A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 20, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic (Fraud) at the Seoul Central District Court on November 20, 2015, and is still pending in the final appeal.

around 17:00 on October 14, 2015, the Defendant, at the Seoul Central District Court 519, as the distribution of Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court (Seoul Central District Court 519) on November 20, 2015, Defendant C was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for two years, the Defendant was detained by law for one year and six months, and the Defendant was detained by law for violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) against C, and was co-offender who was present as a witness of the case, and was tried to examine the witness after separation from pleadings.

In the above case, the Defendant (director in charge of D public performance planning private person) and four victims E, etc. of this case were asked to make an investment in “F in 2014” performance and were asked to question whether to make an investment, which is an important material in determining whether to make an investment, “F in 2013,” which is a false statement to the effect that the actual sales amount is “69,908,240 won,” but that “the amount was not 1 billion won,” and that the victim acquired KRW 1.3 billion in total from the victims.

In particular, the Defendant, upon receiving the victim E’s request for related sales data, prepared a false statement of accounts with “934,421,030 won” and sent e-mail the performance sales revenue in 2013, and followed up a false statement of accounts with “934,421,030 won” as indicated in the above statement of accounts, and followed the victim’s false statement to the effect that “the sales place and sales revenue recorded in the above report of accounts” are identical to the actual sales place, such as whether the “E” is the sales place and sales place” as indicated in the above statement of accounts. The victims believe that the performance sales revenue in 2013 is “934,421,030 won” as indicated in the above statement of accounts.

The defendant at the above court.