Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

In order to resolve Defendant A’s bank obligations worth approximately KRW 180,000,000, the Defendants may raise high profits when purchasing and operating E truck, which is a vehicle entering the victim D, in order to resolve the financial obligations of Defendant A, which amount to approximately KRW 180,000,00.

The author tried to acquire money from the damaged person in the name of the purchase cost of the vehicle.

Defendant

B around September 2015, the victim made a telephone conversation with the victim D, and the victim “The F would immediately be forced to retire while working in E, and there is no money that the F would be allowed to purchase the f's entrance vehicle before the punishment is retired, and if the f will purchase the f's vehicle before the punishment is retired, the owner of the f's vehicle will become the owner of the f's vehicle and the monthly income will be KRW 700-8 million, and the profit will be deposited into the head of the Tong.

The Defendants made a false statement as “A”, and the Defendants met the victim at “H main point located in Y in Y in the same period at the same time, and Defendant B again made the victim a talk about the vehicle in question as above, and Defendant A made a false statement to the victim that “I would like to purchase the vehicle due to the import of the vehicle at night, so I would like to have the vexed with the birth of the vexetator, and you would live with the vexed vehicle.”

On October 10 of the same year, the Defendants continued to look at the victim at “H main point” located in Hasan-si, Hasan-si, G, and Defendant B again saw the victim as above, and how they think “I think.”

Defendant A asked the victim as “,” and the victim stated that “I believe that there is omission, and that I should proceed with the general officer in charge of military mountain by giving instructions to the general officer in charge of military mountain, and we will know that we will know.”

However, even if the Defendants received money from the injured party, they did not have the intent or ability to purchase the E-freight in the name of the injured party.

On October 16, 2015, the Defendants were to have the direct account of 20,000,000 won from the injured party.