1.(a)

Attached Form

As to each real estate listed in the list 1, Defendant I traded to Defendant U on September 2, 1998.

In light of the above legal principles, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the registration of ownership transfer, and the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the registration of ownership transfer, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal.

The process of changing the ownership of the part that the plaintiffs acquired is as follows.

(1) The plaintiff's apartment section of this case is specified as the number of units, AD - Defendant I (Sale on June 21, 198) - the plaintiff A* 2: Sale and purchase on June 25, 198 (Sale on June 8, 1990) - Sale and purchase on June 25, 197 (Sale on August 2, 200) - the plaintiff Eul- 5 (Sale on June 25, 200): Sale and purchase on the plaintiff's shares - 9 sale and purchase on the plaintiff's shares - 29 sale and purchase on the plaintiff's shares - 197 (Sale on August 2, 200: 3) - Sale and purchase on the plaintiff's shares - 194 (Sale on July 4, 198) - Sale and purchase on the plaintiff's shares - 196.

E. On the other hand, after the death on May 24, 2015, NN succeeded to three-seven shares in Defendant Q Q, the wife of which, and two-seven shares in each of the Defendant R and S, respectively. On March 12, 2011, AT died on and on March 12, 201, and succeeded to three-fourth shares in its property.

[Reasons for Recognition]