1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 36,472,048; (b) KRW 76,124,222; and (c) KRW 35,776,396 to Plaintiff C; and (c) respectively.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On July 1950 immediately after the outbreak of Korean War, many military police units in the relevant region, including Daegu, Kimcheon-si, and police stations belonging to the police stations in the Daegu-do area, and members of the Gyeongbuk-dong area CIC (Information Bureau of the Army Information Bureau), were killed in the area of the relevant Si/Gun without undergoing trial procedures, by moving a large number of inmates, who were detained in prison in Daegu, Kimcheon-do, and Ansan-dong area, to various places of the relevant Si/Gun, including the National Report Federation, etc., whose preliminary inspection was conducted in some areas at the time, and who were detained in prison in the Daegu-si area at the time of the outbreak of the Korean War.

(hereinafter referred to as "sacrificing a prisoner in prison in Daegu North Korea area" (hereinafter referred to as "sacrificing a prisoner in prison").

On May 31, 2005, the Korean History Settlement Commission established pursuant to the Framework Act on the Settlement of History for Truth (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on the Settlement of History") for the Settlement of Truth (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on the Settlement of History") established on May 31, 2005, received an application for ascertaining the truth of the persons related to the case of sacrifice of prison inmates in the Daegu-gu North metropolitan area from December 1, 2005 to November 30, 2006, and conducted an applicant investigation, witness investigation, field investigation, etc.

As a result of the investigation, on June 29, 2010, the Korean Supreme Court rendered a decision to the effect that the CIC and military police officers, each region police officers, etc. posted in each region on the case of sacrifice of inmates in prison in Daegu North Korea, were murdered collectively without legal procedure (hereinafter “the truth-finding decision of this case”), and D (hereinafter “the deceased”) were included in the list of victims.

C. The parties’ status relationship and their family relationship Plaintiff B are the deceased’s spouse, and Plaintiff C and A are the deceased’s children.

At the time of the death of the deceased, family members of the family head E, mother F, each G (Marriage of April 19, 1940), H, I, I, Lee Dong-dongs J, wife B, respectively.