logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.04.10 2013고정331
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a Category B car.

On July 20, 2012, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol of 0.130% of blood alcohol concentration on July 20, 2012, and proceeded with the three-lane road in front of the Fili Changwon Industrial Complex located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Area 9-39 at the reverse village of Eunpyeong-gu at a speed of the city speed according to one-lane from the flow distance away from the back of the calendar distance.

The Defendant had a U.S. intern to proceed with the opposite line, and the place is where the yellow solid lines are installed, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to make a U.S. intern at the permissible point of the U.S. driver.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was driven by the victim C (year 35) who was driving in one lane in the same direction by neglecting the center line by neglecting it, and was driven by the victim C (year 35) who was driving in the same direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim C, such as catum salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, due to the foregoing occupational negligence, and injury to the E (V, 83 years of age) who was accompanied by the said catum sp, etc., for about two weeks of medical treatment.

2. On July 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) driven a B Mt Motor Vehicle while under the influence of alcohol at approximately 100 meters from the section of about 100 meters, from the front day of a alcohol house in the reverse village in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the front day of the Fym Industrial Complex in the same 9-39.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A traffic accident investigation report, a traffic accident report, a report on the detection of the driver concerned, and a statement in the circumstances of the driver concerned;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow