logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.06.16 2016고단2658
사기등
Text

The crime No. 1, No. 2-b, (c), (d), (e), and (f) of the judgment is punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one month for the crime No. 2 of the judgment of the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On December 21, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor and one year of suspended execution for the crime of injury at the Daegu District Court on December 21, 2012, and the above judgment was finalized on December 29, 2012. On October 15, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor and one year of suspended execution, and the above judgment was finalized on October 23, 2015.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant and B (a person who attempted to commit fraud) committed a joint crime with the Defendant and B (a person who requested a summary order on the same day) conspired to acquire insurance proceeds by means of claiming repair expenses, etc. from an insurance company after having caused an intentional accident.

Accordingly, around April 17, 2014, at around 23:10, the defendant and B received the accident from the victim's fire marine insurance company, as the actual traffic accident occurred after he received the defendant's FOs car which was parked intentionally by driving the EOs car before the D Hospital located in the Gu-U.S., B.D.

As such, the Defendant conspired with B, by deceiving the victim, and attempted to receive insurance money from the victim, but did not have the intent to have the wind known to the victim.

2. Fraud;

A. On July 1, 2012, around 13:48, the Defendant solely committed the Defendant’s criminal act, called the Victim LIG Non-Life Insurance Co., Ltd., in the vicinity of the H kindergarten located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do., and received the insurance. In receiving the insurance, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant was driving an Ichip car with a female-friendly household, leading to a female-friendly household room, thereby damaging two of the phone calls owned by a female-friendly household.”

However, the de facto damaged mobile phone was a woman-friendly Gu.

J was only one cellular phone of J.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was paid KRW 601,00 as repair expenses for cell phones around July 2012 from the victim.

B. The Defendant and K jointly committed the crime, the Defendant and K (request for a summary order on the same day), and L receive an accident after having caused the intentional accident, and the insurance company claims the repair cost, etc. from the insurance company.

arrow