Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

[2] On May 11, 2012, Defendant A received a summary order of KRW 5,00,000 from the Eastern District Court of Seoul to a fine of KRW 5,000,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and a fine of KRW 5,00,000 for the same crime in the same court on April 12, 2013. On April 24, 2014, the Seoul High Court sentenced Defendant A to rape, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence in the third intersection of the North Korean North Korean Peninsula on July 11, 2017. Defendant B received a summary order of KRW 1,50,00,000 for a fine of KRW 1,50,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Sungnam branch of Suwon District Court of Seoul to the same court on May 22, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. On April 2, 2018, at around 04:30, Defendant A driven a F-to-purn-purged vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of at least 0.109% in the three-meter section of “E” road located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul.

As a result, the Defendant again driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, who has violated the prohibition provisions on drinking more than twice.

2. On April 2, 2018, Defendant B driven a F-hurged car with a alcohol concentration of 0.115% under the influence of alcohol at a 1m section prior to the “E” main road located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-si, Seo-gu.

As a result, the Defendant again driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, who has violated the prohibition provisions on drinking more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. On-site and vehicle photographs;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving under drinking;

1. Statement report and investigation report on the situation of the driver at each main driver (report on the situation of the driver at the main driver);

1. Previous convictions: A reply to inquiry, such as each criminal history, investigation report (verification of the same record of the suspect), additional summary order, investigation report (verification of the fact that the suspect is a suspect A repeated crime), additional court rulings, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the status of confinement of each individual;

1. Defendants: the pertinent legal provisions and the choice of punishment on criminal facts: each of the Defendants is subject to the provision of Article 148-2.