logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.04.13 2018고정50
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 12, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for four months at the Incheon District Court for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 20th of the same month.

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving service of Clearning cars.

On March 17, 2017, around 19:40, the Defendant proceeded at a speed of 70km depending on two lanes from the 10km south East-dong-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, toward the 2nd west-dong side of the highway, which is the 2nd west-dong-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, toward the boundary of the window. The Defendant changed the course to the 3rd km.

In such cases, the driver has a duty of care to inform the person engaged in driving service of the change of course by direction, etc. in advance, and to prevent the accident in advance by safely changing the lane in the situation of traffic before and after the change.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and neglected to change the course, and received the front part of the E-Tracked Vehicle E-Tracked in the victim's drive, which was placed in accordance with three-lanes, into the left upper part.

In addition, this shocked the victim's G Ethl-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-rayed vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the Victim F, such as light salt in need of approximately two weeks’ medical treatment by occupational negligence as above, and the victim D suffered injury, such as salt pans, tensions, etc. in the shoulder pipe that requires approximately two weeks’ medical treatment to the victim D.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, such as paragraph 1, destroyed the damaged property that requires repair equivalent to KRW 191,440, such as the exchange of the victim F’s Tbluri passenger car in a traffic accident as set forth in paragraph 1, and KRW 2,761,30, such as the exchange of the center spread of the victim D's Track Track Track vehicle.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is the owner of a reproduced motor vehicle as stated in paragraph (1).

The defendant is unable to operate a motor vehicle on a road without mandatory insurance, and the defendant is stated in paragraph (1).

arrow