A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2014 Highest 2071" is a person who is engaged in driving a CRa car.

1. On February 15, 2014, the Defendant, without a driver’s license on February 17:15, 2014, driven the said car by driving the said car from the day near the “Saong-gu Si”-dong located in the Busan East-gu, Busan, to the gold village in the same Gu to the day near the 145 neighboring roads.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Egressing Vehicles) and the Violation of Road Traffic Act (Chress after accidents) committed a duty of care to drive safely, such as making it possible for a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle to drive a motor vehicle above the three-dimensional car at the end of the day set forth in the above paragraph 1, and driving a road front of the road to a gold village from the side of the hot spring elementary school, since he/she had a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle, such as reporting the traffic situation well, accurately manipulating the steering gear, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded on the part of the victim D(27) driving before the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding, and received the right side part of the victim D(27) driving vehicle’s E unit Nos. 27 on the left side of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, immediately stopped to the above victim D with injury to salt, tensions, etc. in light of light tensions, etc., requiring the above victim D’s treatment for about three weeks, suffered injury to the victim F (the age 27 years) who was on board the damaged vehicle, such as salt, tensions, etc., which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and escaped without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim F (the age 27).

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act did not subscribe to mandatory insurance, as the owner of the said CRa, and did not subscribe to the said automobile at the time, time, and place mentioned in the said paragraph (1).