The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In relation to the violation of the Act on the Prevention of misunderstanding of Facts, the court below found the defendant guilty of this part of the charges, although the defendant only had a few vagabonds, and the defendant did not interfere with the execution of duties by assaulting or threatening train crew D as stated in the judgment of the court below. Thus, the court below erred

B. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 관한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들을 종합하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 ① 열차승무원 D은 수사기관 및 원심 법정에서 일관되게 여수발 용산행 C 열차 내에서 피고인에게 승차권을 보여달라고 하였더니 피고인이 식칼로 배를 짼다고 말하였고, 피고인이 D의 제복 넥타이를 잡고 뒤로 밀쳐서 넘어졌다고 진술한 점, ② 승객 E도 수사기관 및 원심 법정에서 일관되게 피고인이 팔로 열차승무원의 목을 밀어서 열차승무원이 넘어지는 것을 보았다고 진술한 점 등에 비추어 보면, 피고인이 원심 판시와 같이 철도종사자인 D을 협박하고 폭행하여 D의 승차권검표 및 무임승차 단속 등에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해한 사실을 충분히 인정할 수 있으므로, 피고인의 위 주장은 이유 없다.

B. It is recognized that the Defendant’s mistake on certain crimes is divided, etc.

However, it is not good that the crime of this case is committed, the defendant committed again during the period of repeated crime of the same kind even though he had been tried for the same kind of crime, and the damage recovery or agreement has not been reached to the trial. The sentencing balance with the criminal of this case is the balance with the criminal of this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior and environment, the motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc. are shown in the arguments of this case.