Defendants are not guilty. The summary of each judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

Indictment

A. Defendant A1) On January 21, 2014, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol 0.071% in blood alcohol level, and around 17:00, the Defendant driven a F Fextonton car from the branch office of Korea Cadastral Corporation E in Chungcheongnam-nam D to the external intersection located in Chungcheongnam-gun outside of the budget of Chungcheongnam-gun, and up to approximately 3km to the external intersection. (2) The Defendant attempted to conceal the fact that the Defendant driven a drunk driving as above, the Defendant asked the police officer, who is an employee of the Korea Cadastral Corporation E branch office of Korea Cadastral Corporation in which the Defendant works as the head of the branch office, to make a false statement. (3) On the other hand, the Defendant asked the police officer, who is the employee of the Korea Cadastral Corporation E branch office, to have the Defendant drive the said vehicle.

As a result, B made a false statement to the police officer of the budget police station G District in the front of the border, who was called to the front of the border, to the effect that H was driving the said car, and on the same day, B made a written statement to the effect that H was driving the said car in the G District located in the Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Unit I, and submitted it to the police officer whose name is not known.

Accordingly, the defendant instigated the above B to escape a person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

B. At around 17:40 on January 21, 2014, Defendant B made a false statement to the police officer who was asked by the Defendant to inquire whether the Defendant driven a F Fschton car from H while driving the said car in the way other than the G Zone located outside of the Yannam Budget Office, and on the same day, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that he would drive the said car, and submitted a written statement to the police officer who could not know the same purport in G Zone I located in the Haan Budget Office on the same day, and made a statement to the police officer with the same purport.

As a result, the defendant, who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment, had the above A escape.

Judgment

Each of the instant facts charged against the Defendants.