logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.04.03 2017누86059
공무상요양불승인 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts added, thereby citing it in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. On the 12th day of the first instance judgment, the 60 to 63th day after the 45th day of the 12th instance judgment, and the 2 and 4th day after the 1st day of the 1st instance judgment, respectively.

The following shall be added to 4.3 pages of the judgment of the first instance.

(A) On June 15, 2016, the following shall be added to the fourth nine pages of the judgment of the first instance. (No circumstance exists that the plaintiff was designated as a target of attendance, and the remaining part is classified)

④ In April 2012, the Plaintiff received medical treatment related to a shoulder prior to 2016, the Plaintiff did not confirm other than the Plaintiff’s one-time medical treatment as a “satisf and tension of a shoulder,” and in May 2012, the Plaintiff’s “satisfying sofying softening softening softening softening softening softening softening is regarded as a satching disease.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow