logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.07.04 2019고단1911
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 15, 2019, around 16:53 on April 15, 2019, the Defendant started 119 withdrawal from the street room before the waste plastic removal warehouse located in Masung-si B, and is wald with the head of the management office.

shall request assistance.

“Along with the 112 report of the content, “A” was shakingd with the Defendant’s her mother E at the scene of questioning about the on-site situation in which the Defendant assaulted F by the Defendant’s mother E at the scene, and the Defendant Da Da Da had scam “I scam to do so,” and the above D prevented the Defendant from doing the above action.

As such, the Defendant, in his hand, flabed the balth of the above D, and flabed the chest and her arms, and refused to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and assaulted the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties by using the balth of the above D’s bridge toward the bridge, making the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth, with his hand,

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's 112 report processing and legitimate execution of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offenders.

2. The Defendant damaged the property by taking a video image of the Defendant’s act using a cell phone of 8 flives, the market value of which is one million won owned by the victim, after receiving the said 112 report at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1). In order to prevent the Defendant from taking a video of the Defendant’s act using a cell phone of 8 flives, which is the victim of the said 1.12 report, G was destroyed by taking the above cell phone used by the victim’s victim’s cell phone from cutting off

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police officer's statement about D and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged goods and investigation reports (the statement of the H fire fighter belonging to the Fire Fighting Station);

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act are applicable;

arrow