A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:20 on April 9, 2015, the Defendant began to set aside a fluort while openly leaving a fluorous vehicle on a roadway in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, prior to the C convenience store.

Accordingly, the victim's leader E (the age of 37) was removed from the police station of Seoul Mapo Police Station D District E (the age of 37) and her hand flab, and the police officer was the head of the police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers to interfere with legitimate performance of official duties concerning crime prevention and investigation of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Violence by police officers, partic photo, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( considered as the following favorable circumstances):

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] The execution of the sentence shall be postponed on the condition of community service, taking into account the following factors: (a) the first category of obstruction of the performance of official duties (the six-month and one year and four months) basic area (the person who has been subject to special punishment] (the decision of sentence] [the decision of sentence] the fact that there is a criminal record of being sentenced to a fine of three million won in 2006 and a fine of two million won in 2009, and a criminal record of being sentenced to a fine of five million won in 209 as a crime of obstruction of the performance of the same kind of official duties; and (b)

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) around 00:20 on April 9, 2015, the Defendant received a 112 report from the victim Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Police Station D District F (the age of 37) to the effect that he was “the host of the disturbance” in front of the C convenience store located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and received a request for identification card from the victim Mapo-gu Police Station F (the age of 37) who was called out, and the majority of citizens in the name unrefluencies in that place are fluent

It is an assistant to the inside of the Republic of Korea, and the width will not be limited.

Cracks and pits shall be cut as soon as possible.