logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2020.02.06 2019고정883
의료법위반
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won, each of whom shall be punished by a fine of 800,000 won, Defendant B, D, E, and C.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a marina business with the trade name of “J” in subparagraphs 2, D, E, and 1 of the Ftel 2 stories G, U.S., U.S., the Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do, and the Gyeonggi-do, and the employees of Defendant B, Defendant D, Defendant E, and Defendant C are those who work as a marina business office at the above business.

1. No person who is not qualified as a defendant A inseminator shall establish a massage place or massage place;

Nevertheless, from September 201 to April 19, 2019, the Defendant installed 16 rooms in the Ftel G, H and I rooms in Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si from around September 2017 to April 19, 201, and operated a massage practice in a way that female employees receive 38,000 won from 22,00 won to 38,000 won, 66,000 won from 33,000 won from 33,000 won to 66,000 won, and 5,000 won from 80 won to 66,00 won from 44,000 won to 55,00 won from the above customers.

Accordingly, the Defendant did not have the qualification to be a massage, and the Defendant established a massage place as above.

2. No person who is not accredited as a inseminator for defendant B, D, E, or C shall be allowed to be massage for profit.

Nevertheless, the Defendants were from March 2019 to the same year.

4. By June 1, 200, at the same place as above, A received KRW 60,00 per day from an unspecified number of customers by means of telegraph transfer or by taking custody of an unspecified number of customers.

As a result, the Defendants did not obtain the recognition of Marine, and carried out the Marine for profit as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Articles 87(1)2, 82(3), and 33(2)1 of the former Medical Service Act (Amended by Act No. 16375, Apr. 23, 2019); the choice of fines

B. Defendant B, D, E, and C: Article 88 subparag. 3 of the Medical Service Act.

arrow