1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

"1. Reasons for the disposition" in the reasoning of the judgment of this court which partially accepted the judgment of the first instance;

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion;

(b) the relevant legislation;

C. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, with the exception of the following, is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (2.2.4 to 8.9.). Thus, it is accepted pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 【The part to be used after dismissal’s 2.2. The defendant did not present the following grounds: “The amount of USD 303 per ton, US$ 240 per ton, US$ 284 per ton, US$ 284 per ton, US$ 937 per ton, 1,206 per ton, and US$ 1,206. 3. 3. Do, 11 and 12. 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . 2 . 3 . . 1) and 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ... .... ...... ........... ............. ...................... ..................

(7) add “The purchase specification” in the first sentence of “(5) of “(7)” to “the purchase specification of the agricultural product in the year 2010”. The seven upper parts of “the area of the farmland in the year 2010” shall add the following:

In addition, the result of the inspection of the diversity of the instant goods (No. 24) and the color, shape, size, and the degree of the diversity of the instant goods (No. 24) are similar to that of the diversity of the 2010 U.S. Agricultural and Fishery Corporation imported by the Agricultural and Fishery Corporation.The 7th parallels 15 to 8th parallels 7th parallels (8) and 7th parallels (8)

【8) The Plaintiff entered Korea on May 30, 201, after shipping agricultural products purchased from the Dasan International Trade Limited Corporation and the Dabongsung International Trade Limited Corporation from the Defendant on May 30, 201, the same price as the reported price of this case.