1. Upon a claim for change in exchange at the trial, the Plaintiff shall:

A. Defendant B is listed in Appendix 2 List 2.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for partial modification and addition as follows.

2. As follows, the amendment and addition were made to 6th 19th 3th 19th 3th 19th 19th 19th 18th 19th 19th 2th 19 of the judgment of the first instance, and some of 18th 19th and 19th 19th 2th 2th 2th 200 were added to the following: (a) Defendant B occupied each of the instant real estate with the intention to own each of the instant real estate in peace and openly perform its ownership at the time after completing the registration of ownership transfer; and (b) Defendant C also occupied each of the instant real estate with the intent to own each of the instant real estate in peace and openly perform its possession with the intent to own each of the instant real estate; (c) the completion of the prescription of possession was completed; (d) the Defendant’s assertion of the said Defendants is without raising any objection to inheritance (the Defendant did not object to inheritance; (d) the Plaintiff agreed to receive K land donation from D

In light of the evidence No. 9, the Plaintiff’s donation of the above land from D is recognized, but this merely appears to be an individual agreement between the Plaintiff and D on the condition that the prohibition of real estate disposal, which was completed in relation to the above real estate disposal, was revoked on February 27, 2006. The registration of cancellation of the provisional disposal, which was completed in relation to each of the above real estate disposal, was made on May 31, 2006, and the K land donation to D was made on May 31, 2006 (see evidence No. 7-1, No. 3, and No. 9). The fact alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the agreement on the division of inheritance between co-inheritors was effective, and it is otherwise recognized.