logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.09.02 2014고단934 (1)
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 5, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively, deadly weapons, etc.) made a threat to the victim by stating that, within the main point of “D 1st underground floor in Bupyeong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, the Defendant, at around 05:20 on December 5, 2013, he went out of the country, to the effect that the said female employees would be in good quality and quality, and that he went out of the country, E, who is another customer, and then went back to the country, after he returned to the country, he would go back to the F, and then go back to the time, the victim E (the age of 27) who is a dangerous object (the age of 27) would go back to the victim, and threaten the victim, as the victim would be.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

2. 폭행 피고인은 2013. 12. 5. 05:30경 부천시 원미구 G 앞 노상에서 위와 같은 이유로 피해자 E과 시비되어 손바닥으로 피해자의 뺨을 때리고, 피해자 F(28세)이 위 E과 함께 피고인을 폭행하자 이에 대항하여 피해자 F의 오른쪽 정강이를 발로 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, F, and E;

1. The statement of F in the police interrogation protocol of the police interrogation protocol of F [the second statement of the police interrogation protocol of F (the defendant and the defense counsel argued that there was no threat or assault against the victims. Thus, the following circumstances acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, F, E, the victim, made a statement about the current situation at the time of the investigation agency and this court. Although some accurately and accurately unsatisfying parts, it appears that the defendant went out of the court, but it goes back again, and f (the nearest side of the entrance to the entrance and exit) again f (the defendant was seated on the back to the nearest side of the beer's fying, and the defendant was fying about the beer while fying the beer's disease in the process, and it was from the drinking house.

arrow