Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CM7 car.

Around 00:20 on January 18, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car, while driving the road in front of the Dolle in front of the Dolle 196-9, Seoyang-Eup, Nam-gu, Namyang-do, Gyeonggi-do, to the protection of the Domino, the Defendant left the left bridge of the victim D (32 years old) (32 years old) who driven the road from the right side of the course of the operation and the course of the operation of the vehicle without thoroughly examining the right and the right and the right and the right and the right are, due to the occupational negligence of the vehicle, driven from the front part of the driver's vehicle to the left part of the driver's vehicle, sustained injury such as salt, tension, etc. in need of approximately two-day medical treatment, and even if she immediately stops, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. An interrogation protocol of the police against the accused (second time);

1. The actual survey report and the investigation report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of accident-related photographs, site photographs, and on-site surveys and photographs;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 5-3 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act and selection of fines concerning the crime

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the provisional payment order, the Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that the injury suffered by the victim is a minor scambling, and that the victim also affixed a photo with his/her signature and divided his/her fry about the cause of the accident, and that there was no need to take relief measures because of the situation where she should do so.

Article 5-3 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes does not take measures under Article 50 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, such as aiding a victim, and "when a victim runs away."