beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff’s notary public against the Defendant is a law firm Lee LLC, set forth in No. 177 of 201,000.
Reasons
Basic Facts
On February 28, 2011, the Plaintiff issued to the Defendant a promissory note No. 130 million won per face value, the date of issuance on February 28, 201, and the date of payment on May 28, 2011, No. 2011, No. 177 of the Promissory Notes No. 201, Feb. 16, 201, and the due date of payment on February 16, 201, and the due date of payment on May 16, 201, by a notary public, No. 0087 of the Promissory Notes No. 2011, May 16, 201, respectively.
On August 25, 2015, the Defendant filed an application for registration of default on the Plaintiff (Seoul Southern District Court 2015 Chicago1494) with each of the aforesaid promissory notes.
[Grounds] The plaintiff alleged that Gap evidence Nos. 1-2, 2-2, and 2-3 were written and the purport of the whole pleadings was asserted by the parties to the dispute. The defendant did not lend money to the defendant. Thus, each of the above promissory notes is alleged to have terminated by the statute of limitations, and each of the above promissory notes was lent to the plaintiff for money for three months and the defendant received each of the said promissory notes for the payment. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified.
Judgment
The extinctive prescription of each of the instant promissory notes is complete unless it is exercised within three years from the maturity date (Articles 78, 77(1)8, and 70(1) of the Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes Act). The fact that the payment date of each of the instant promissory notes was May 16, 201, and May 28, 201, is the same as seen earlier, and that the Defendant applied for the registration of default on obligations on or after May 16, 2014 and May 28, 2014, since it is apparent that the Defendant applied for the registration of default on obligations on or after May 16, 2014 and May 28, 2014. Therefore, each of the instant promissorysory notes credit has expired due
I would like to say.
In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition by admitting it.