logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.03.14 2017고정1627
사기미수등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 27, 2016, the Defendant was present at the police station B of the Gyeonggi-do branch of the police station, and the fact is that the Defendant-friendly C appeared on October 20, 2016, and even if the Defendant-friendly C caused a traffic accident on the roads under the same high-priced level of the Dong-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, the Defendant prepared a false statement to the effect that he/she is the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident, upon request from the above C to the effect that he/she would cause the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident, and let the police officer escape the above C who committed the crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment by making a false statement to the same effect.

2. On October 20, 2016, the Defendant attempted to commit fraud, when communicating with C at a place where it is unknown at around 20:40 on October 20, 2016, and, with respect to the foregoing traffic accident caused by C, the Defendant, who was the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident, was urged to receive insurance proceeds by receiving the accident from

On October 27, 2016, the Defendant appeared at the police station B of the 2017:10 on October 27, 2016 according to the above public offering and received a false accident by phone call to the victim, the fire insurance company of the 201st unit of the accident, even though he did not have paid the above traffic accident, and to employees in the name of the 201st unit of the accident.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with C to induce the victim to receive insurance money from the victim, but the Defendant knew that he was not the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident, and subsequently withdrawn the receipt and subsequently did so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident by Defendant C

1. Articles 151(1) (a) and 352, 347(1), and 30 (a) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, as well as the choice of fines, for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.

arrow