1. From October 1, 2015, 15% per annum among the claims for damages for delay in the judgment of the court of first instance, including the part expanded in the trial.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the instant case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the correction or the defendants' assertion is

The part of the judgment of the first instance, 8, 9 (f) “paragraph...” shall be amended as follows:

As of September 18, 2010, the value-added tax on the instant construction project (construction services) is the amount to be reduced by a total of 38.5 billion won or less. The Plaintiff also claims the amount of value-added tax on the basis of the above amount. The total value-added tax is the same amount as the value-added tax on the basis of the management and disposition plan dated August 9, 2014, but the expected amount of value-added tax is 3.6 billion won for the supply of goods or services under the instant project and construction project in the aggregate over a number of taxable periods of value-added tax or reporting periods. Accordingly, the purchase of the Defendant union was relatively higher, but more sales were made thereafter, and the payment of value-added tax is expected to be made based on the management and disposition plan of value-added tax on September 18, 2010 to KRW 1.5 billion or KRW 8.8 billion for the construction cost of the instant project in the first time.

"The 17th day of September 18, 2010" in the 17th day of the first instance judgment shall be deleted.

The 15th sentence of the judgment of the first instance is as follows.