beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.
Defendant
B shall be innocent.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A, on December 20, 2005, the fact at the office of Pyeongtaek-si E Real Estate was false when the owner G was not the owner of Pyeongtaek-si 201, but the owner G was not the owner of Defendant A, but the sale authority was not delegated, but the victim H was delegated to purchase 40 million won.
Defendant
A received 1 million won as the down payment from the victim on the same day as the down payment, and 10 million won as the intermediate payment on January 6, 2006, and acquired 2 million won in total.
Summary of Evidence
1. Each legal statement of the defendant A and B
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;
1. Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 347(1) of the Act on the Selection of Punishment for Defendant A with the reason of sentencing for Defendant A has fled for a long period of six years since the crime of this case.
In light of the fact that the Defendant was arrested, even after a long time from the date and time of the crime, failed to reach an agreement with the victim and did not take any measures for recovery from damage, and that the instant crime was committed by the Defendant Company A, even though it was committed by the investigation agency to the point of view, there was no change from time to time by the investigation agency to time in this court, and there was no change in the statement from time to time, and there was no change in the form of reflect that the Defendant B was the principal offender, and there was no change in the method of avoiding his responsibility. Therefore, the responsibility for the relevant crime is unreasonable to punish the Defendant significantly
In addition, considering such circumstances and various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of the instant case, the sentence shall be determined as per the Disposition.
Parts of innocence
1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) Defendant B introduced, even though he was aware that he was not owned by Defendant A, that he was dementia No. 201 (hereinafter “instant lending”); (b) and (c) Defendant A introduced, even though he was aware of the fact that he was not owned by Defendant A, Defendant B purchased the said F lending No. 201 (hereinafter “instant lending”).