logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.04.21 2017고단101
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is an operator of a DNA massage practice establishment located in Simpo City C.

From April 5, 2016 to July 26, 2016, the Defendant was equipped with 18 rooms with bed and shower facilities in the above massage treatment place, and received 1.60,000 won from many unspecified male customers who found the above massage treatment place, and then arranged sexual intercourse with the female selling 80 times in total, such as B, an employee of the above massage treatment place, to arrange sexual intercourse.

2. Defendant B

A. From July 22, 2016 to July 25, 2016, the Defendant, who violated the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts, such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic (sexual traffic) served as an employee on the condition that he/she would receive KRW 80,000 per case of sexual traffic from A at the place of the said place of the massage treatment from around July 22, 2016 to July 25, 2016, engaged in sexual traffic by engaging in sexual intercourse on eight occasions each day with many unspecified male customers who find the place of the

B. On July 26, 2016, when the Defendant was found to have been suspected of engaging in sexual traffic at the D Anama clinic located in C at the time of Mapo-si on the written form received from the police officer, the Defendant discovered “E”, “F” in the name column, “F” in the resident registration number column, “Slsan-gu G” in the residential column, and “H” in the content column as a letter introduction from July 23, 2016 to make him/her perform the work, and had him/her perform the work on the condition that he/she will be sold to each customer.

The Red Sea Shes, upon entry into the room, be put in the entrance Shebi gran,

It was only one time that you did not receive any guest.

In so far, the statements are true

The phrase “E” was written at the end of the document, stating “E, July 26, 2016,” and was stamped by the Defendant on the name side of the document.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged one copy of a statement in the name of E, which is a private document on fact certification.

(c)

The defendant is aware of the forgery at the time and place specified in Article 2-2 (b).

arrow