1. The Plaintiff’s rehabilitation claim against the Plaintiff Company B is KRW 34,810,050 and the rehabilitation claim against the Plaintiff Company B from July 25, 2017.

1. The following facts are acknowledged to the effect that there is no dispute or the entire pleadings, in addition to each macro- documentary evidence.

The plaintiff is an attorney-at-law who mainly deals with litigation affairs and international transactions.

On December 19, 2016, the rehabilitation debtor B (hereinafter referred to as the "non-party B") requested the Plaintiff to provide legal advice.

The content is the content that attracts investment from the U.K. D's D's investment method, and the Convertied No. is a method of using a large amount of initial investment in promising Lone Star business to refer to U.S. convertible bonds or unsecured convertible bonds.

- Scope of work: Until the conclusion of the contract and its subsequent supplement work (i.e., consultation during the process of concluding the contract, (ii) consideration of the contract, and other necessary legal advice required by the mandators) - Remuneration: 500,000 won per hour for each time (excluding value-added tax) entered into an international trade advisory contract with the non-party company on December 19, 2016, with the following contents:

[B] The advisory contract was prepared in the name of “C”, the representative of the non-party company, but the upper part of the contract includes the name of the non-party company in the name of “C,” and as seen thereafter, the Plaintiff issued a tax invoice in the name of the non-party company and processed it normally, and the non-party company is a party directly attracting investment from the English company, and thus the subject subject to legal advice from the Plaintiff is also the non-party company. In light of the fact that the party who entered into an international trade advisory contract with the Plaintiff should be deemed to be the non-party company, the other party who entered into the international trade advisory contract with the Plaintiff should be deemed to be not the non-party company, but the non-party company as its representative from December 19, 2016 to March 10, 2017. The Plaintiff conducted various advisory affairs (review of the contract terms and conditions, etc., review of the draft contract, English practice and Russian data,

The plaintiff is from January 3, 2017 to April 3, 2017.