logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.05.09 2013고정2943
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is published.

Reasons

1. On September 1, 2013, at around 13:20 on September 1, 2013, the Defendants asserted the assault of the Victim G within the Fridge located in Daegu Suwon-gu E, and Defendant B, by hand, assaulted the Victim’s left hand, fluor, Defendant A, who was on the back, was also in a fluor, and was in a fluor of the Victim’s chest by hand, thereby causing injury to the Victim, such as a 4 fluoral fluor, which requires four weeks of medical treatment.

2. Determination:

A. Defendant B’s statement and injury diagnosis letter are admissible as to whether Defendant B’s left fingers were inconsistent with G’s left fingers.

However, G’s statements are difficult to believe as they are as follows.

In the case of injury diagnosis, it is not sufficient to recognize it for the reasons as seen below, and there is no evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.

(1) G’s statement part G stated to the effect that “the person’s personal arms were sold to Defendant B in his own hands and was laid to the church platform, and the person who was a party to the case did not go to his own left arm’s length, left hand or left hand hand,” and the investigative agency stated to the effect that “the person who was a party to the case did not go to the party to the case.”

arrow