1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver each real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b) pay 109,774,193 Won;

2...

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to the cause of the claim Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (including additional numbers) around April 3, 2013, the plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the defendant on the following grounds: (a) around April 3, 2013: (b) around KRW 202, KRW 203, and KRW 204, KRW 100,000, KRW 450,000, and KRW 17, April 17, 2013 to July 16, 2017; (c) around October 10, 2013, each of the above lease agreements entered into between the defendant and KRW 205,00,000, KRW 206, and KRW 100,000, KRW 203, and KRW 201,07, respectively, for the reasons that each of the above lease agreements was terminated; and (d) the plaintiff was lawfully delivered to the defendant from March 20, 2019, respectively.

Therefore, the Defendant shall deliver to the Plaintiff each real estate listed in the separate sheet, and pay to the Plaintiff the sum of KRW 109,774,193 [the sum of the rents unpaid by the Defendant during the period from September 20, 2013 to November 19, 2013 ( KRW 9,500,000 ( KRW 4,500,000 x 2 months) for the overdue rent from September 20, 2013 to May 29, 2015] to be paid from November 20, 2013 to May 29, 2015.

Furthermore, the Plaintiff asserts to the effect that, even after the termination of each of the above lease agreements, the Defendant occupied each of the above immovables, and thus, sought a return of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent, and thus, the return of unjust enrichment on the ground of benefit without legal grounds.