Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 10,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On March 25, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on March 25, 2020, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 20, 2020.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On September 22, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would immediately repay KRW 500,000,000,000 to the other party, if he/she leased the necessary expenses when he/she worked in Daejeon,” by calls from the victim B.

However, at the time, the Defendant was unable to repay the debt of KRW 1,00,000 borrowed from the victim, and there was no intention or ability to repay the debt even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim because of economic circumstances, such as bearing the debt of KRW 19,00,00 from the lending company without any particular revenue.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 500,000 won from the victim to the Defendant’s account under the name of borrowing money on the same day.

2. On October 2018, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement to the effect that: (b) the Defendant was requested to lend the name of the vehicle from the said victim at a time lower than that of Jinjin-si; and (c) the said victim consented to the request; and (d) the said victim made a false statement to the effect that “It is favorable for the Defendant to make a long-term siren rather than vehicle purchase; (b) he/she is allowed to make a long-term siren without vehicle advance through a siren company currently used by the company in service; and (c) thus, he/she

However, the Defendant did not know that he had been employed in the company at the time, and even if he did not know of the vehicle that could be used without advance payment, he did not have the intent or ability to provide the vehicle to the victim even if he did not receive the vehicle rental cost, and did not meet the economic situation, such as the Defendant was liable for the debt amounting to KRW 19 million from the lending company without any particular import, and thus, was thought to use it at the Defendant’

Nevertheless, there is a need to do so.