1. It is confirmed that each insurance contract described in the separate sheet between the Plaintiff and the Defendant A is null and void.

2. The plaintiff, .

1. Fact-finding;

A. On July 12, 2010, Defendant A entered into an insurance contract with the Plaintiff, whose father and beneficiary were designated as Defendant B, to receive treatment for injury or disease, as indicated in the separate sheet stating that the Plaintiff would receive hospitalization allowances, etc. (hereinafter “each of the instant insurance”).

The beneficiary of each of the instant insurance contracts was changed to Defendant A on February 10, 2012.

B. From September 28, 2011 to October 29, 2011, Defendant B received hospitalization for 32 days from C Hospital as indicated in Table 1, and received respectively insurance proceeds of KRW 10,850,000 from the Plaintiff, Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant B, respectively, in relation to the above hospitalization treatment.

. The number of insurance proceeds of a hospital with no diagnosis of the discharge date (won) on September 28, 201; on October 29, 201, the 1,60,000 c hospital with no chronic activity Category B infection; on May 11, 2012; on June 30, 2012, the 2,50,000 c hospital with no chronic activity Category B infection; on March 3, 2014; on March 2, 2013, the 200 c hospital with no chronic infection B infection; on March 2, 2013, 2013; on March 2, 2013, the 300 hiver disease with chronic infection B infection; on April 2, 2013, the 300 hiver disease with no chronic infection; on March 2, 2013; on March 2, 2014, the 301 hiverosis infection;

(c) Insurance contracts concluded with Defendant B as the insured are as listed in the following table 2:

Table 2: Defendant B.