Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 19,938,58 with respect to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from January 5, 2018 to January 22, 2020.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is an employee of the “F” operated by Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Bupyeong-gu C and D, and the Defendant is a person who operates the “H” from Bupyeong-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City.
B. On January 5, 2018, at around 19:50, the Defendant: (a) carried a breathing of the pole of the breath body installed in a breath in order to prevent the drunk from falling ahead of the said Defendant’s operation company; (b) on the front day of the said Defendant’s operation.
The defendant, without examining whether or not it passes through the road, caused the plaintiff to have the plaintiff go beyond the floor by cutting the string of the road to the string of the road and cutting the string of the plaintiff's string of the string of the road.
The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor for six months and one year of suspended execution on February 14, 2019 for the crime of injury by occupational negligence.
(In the instant case, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the International Hospital, J Rehabilitation Department and Hospital, etc., and received hospital treatment and outpatient treatment for approximately 12 weeks of treatment due to the injury, such as minculation of franchising in the franchisium around the 12 weeks of treatment.
C. Upon recognition of the instant accident as an industrial accident, the Plaintiff was paid KRW 30,732,320 of temporary layoff benefits, medical care benefits 24,012,470 of disability benefits, and disability benefits 9,276,960 from January 5, 2018 to November 30, 2019.
[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Evidence No. 8-1 to 3, Evidence No. 12, Evidence Nos. 1 and 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. According to the above facts of recognition as the ground for the occurrence of liability, the Defendant was engaged in the string of string around the roads adjacent to which the passage of the off-to-land and pedestrians is frequent, and thus, the Defendant neglected his duty of care to prevent accidents from being caused by the string, thereby causing injury to the Plaintiff. As such, the Defendant is liable to compensate for damages sustained by the Plaintiff.
B. Each evidence set forth prior to the limitation of liability.