beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 389,950,300 as well as 5% per annum from October 12, 2012 to November 6, 2013 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The Korea National Housing Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant”) was merged with the Korea Land Corporation on October 1, 2009 and became the “Defendant”.
In the lower court, “Defendant” is not classified before and after the merger.
2) The apartment of this case (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment”) is composed of 736 households, Dong, 8, Dong, 736, Dong, Ga,
A business entity that newly built and sold the instant apartment on September 4, 2007. The Defendant obtained approval for the use of the instant apartment on September 4, 2007. 2) The Plaintiff is an autonomous management organization that constituted the representatives of occupants of the said eight buildings for the management of the instant apartment.
3) From the Defendant, the Defendant Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. entered into a contract with the Defendant for the construction of the instant apartment construction, and the Defendant’s Intervenor Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. entered into a contract for the construction of the instant apartment construction, and the Defendant’s Intervenor Co., Ltd. entered into a contract for the construction of the instant apartment construction and the installation of facilities. (b) Although the Defendant did not construct the part to be built in accordance with the design drawing in the construction of the instant apartment, or repaired several times after the approval for use was modified differently from the design drawing, there remain any defects such as the details of the relevant defect and the amount of the repair up to now. (c) The Plaintiff’s sectional owners of 712 households among the 736 households of the instant apartment, from April 2012 to June 2012, transferred the damage claim in lieu of the defect repair that the Defendant had against the Defendant, and delegated the Plaintiff with the right to notify the assignment of the assignment of the claim.
2) The ratio of part of the above household that transferred the damage claim in lieu of defect repair to the Plaintiff is 96.74% of the total area of the total area of the whole water owned by the 736 households of the instant apartment complex of this case (the small water 2 place forest, hereinafter the same shall apply).
. [The facts that there is no dispute over the basis for recognition, A.