The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaged in driving Cenz C220 vehicles owned by B.

On October 11, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of 20:14, the Defendant continued to drive the above vehicle at a speed of 243 lanes from Macheon-ro, Songpa-gu, Seoul to drive it at a speed of e, Macheon-ro, Seoul, with two lanes between the two lanes in the direction of the Macheon-ro fire station.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle, shall not drive the motor vehicle at a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and injury on others according to the traffic conditions of the road and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and there was a duty of care to safely report the traffic situation and prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the victim D (the 78 years old) who was placed in the Hand cart in the same way as the Handbag and was placed in the previous way, and continued to proceed without discovering the address.

The part of the victim's vehicle was shocked to the road by shocking the victim.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence that caused serious injury to the victim, such as the injury to the right pelpel part of the upper pelpel part, the pelpel part of the upper pelpel part, and the pelpel part of the upper pelpel part, the cerebral cerebral cerebral brain in the upper pel part, the cerebral pel part of the brain executives, the chronic hemal hemopsis damage, the chronic hemopsis, the chronic hemopsis, the chest pressure pelle, the recognition disorder caused by external wound, the pedestrian disability, the urology, and the letoma, etc. caused by cerebral surgery

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions: Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of will: The main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

C. Public prosecution dismissal judgment: According to the records of this case under Article 327 subparag. 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act, the victim agreed with the defendant on June 2019, which was prior to the prosecution of this case.