Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant,

1. Damage and damage of property on December 14, 2013, at the E cafeteria operated by the Government-si (52 years old) of the victim D (52 years old), the damage and damage caused by the victim’s market value of approximately KRW 50,000,00 of the market value owned by the victim, by cutting off the table table at the cafeteria, on the ground that the cafeteria and drinking are each each other while drinking and drinking, and making it smooth.

2. At the time, place, and place of the obstruction of performance of official duties as referred to in the preceding paragraph, the police officer G slope and patrolman, who was called out after receiving a report to avoid disturbance as referred to in the preceding paragraph, attempted to listen to the contents of the instant case to the police officer G slope G and the police officer assigned to the police officer of the Kubu Police Station F Zone G and the relevant police officer, who brought to the slope G, with the desire to “crost, flap, f, f, f, etc., f, f, f, f, f, f, of this bitch.” The police officer interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the duty of sending the report 1

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Each statement of D and I;

1. Damage photographs and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of the value of products damaged by counter-victims);

1. Relevant statutory provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing performance of official duties), 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of causing damage to property), and the choice of each fine (it is not good to be a crime in light of the background, method, etc. of committing the crime; however, it appears that the defendant was led to confession and repent in depth; it appears that the defendant was the initial offender; and that the victim of the property has agreed

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;