logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.12.01 2016누48340
부당해고구제재심판정취소
Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The National Labor Relations Commission between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor on August 27, 2015.

Reasons

(b)in respect of an eligible person from among the persons employed pursuant to paragraph 1, the person may be converted to the person without a fixed period of time;

In such cases, the procedures for conversion, qualifications, and other details shall be governed by the Governor separately.

The evaluation of work performance: Article 87 (Principles of Evaluation of Work Performance) shall evaluate the achievements of the groups subject to evaluation and the performance of their duties, etc. according to the evaluation table of work performance, and shall comply with the following principles:

4. The evaluators shall ensure that the evaluation results are equitable from the overall standpoint of the administration.

Guidance on standards for operating human resources of contract workers;

E. The general contract worker's conversion (time of conversion) - The contract period of the general contract worker (two years) - The work performance evaluation average score* (based on personal evaluation) during the contract period shall not belong to the lower 35% of the same class group. * The work performance evaluation standard shall be calculated based on the personal evaluation standard that does not reflect the collective work performance evaluation so that the capacity of the contract worker can be objectively assessed. * The result of the fair and strict evaluation of the work performance, performance, attitudes, etc. * The result of the fair and strict evaluation of the work performance, performance, etc. * the lack of good or trust month? The Plaintiff's work performance evaluation manual and the implementation plan for the second and second half of the year 2013, and the half of the year 2014 are as follows.

2. The individual evaluation of grades 1 through 5 shall be classified into “performance evaluation” and “performance evaluation” into “performance evaluation,” “performance evaluation,” and “performance evaluation,” respectively, and the team members 4 to 5 shall be 40% of “performance evaluation,” and 60% of “performance evaluation” into S, S, A, B, C, C, C, and D.

arrow