beta
Text
1. At the request of a change from the trial to the exchange, the defendant Gyeongbuk-do F&C is the defendant 100,000 for G and each plaintiff A.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. G was appointed as a public official on January 17, 1997, and worked in the comprehensive civil petition department of the Defendant G GJ (hereinafter “Defendant FF forces”) from around September 9, 2012, and was in charge of the inspection of the results of cadastral survey, the adjustment of cadastral records, etc., and thereafter was released from his position on September 25, 2012 while serving as a public official of Grade VII in the finance division.
B. Since around 197, when G was deemed to have incurred a loss while investing in stocks, he/she used that he/she was a public official of Defendant FF group, and received money from the Plaintiffs as the price for non-public land by deceiving relevant documents, such as the “State property loan agreement (or real estate sale and purchase agreement, loan application for State property loan, and loan purchase application for State property)”. From October 2008 to September 201, G, by deceiving the Plaintiffs that FF-owned river sites were incorporated into four major river developments, and received money from the Plaintiffs as the price for non-public land.
C. On November 2, 2012, G made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant was indicted for committing a crime, such as violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) (hereinafter “instant criminal case”). On March 7, 2013, the said court made a false statement on the following grounds: “Around December 14, 2007, the Defendant sent a phone call to the victim JJ located in the office of Gangnam-gu International Building (hereinafter “Defendant is included in the four-dimensional river site located in Kri-ri, and will cause the Defendant to go against it.”
However, at the time, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to receive the river site even if he received the money from the victim from the person who worked in the integrated civil petition department of the FFA.
As above, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is the agricultural bank account under the name of the defendant in the name of the victim in the name of 10 million won under the name of the victim's public land in the same day.