1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The Plaintiff cited the judgment of the first instance court basically repeats the same assertion in the first instance trial. In light of the allegations and the reasons why the Plaintiff partly supplemented in the first instance trial, the Plaintiff’s statement in the evidence Nos. 9 and No. 16 (including the paper numbers) newly submitted in the first instance trial, and the result of the supplementary evaluation of the first instance court’s Seoul Hospital at the Seoul Hospital at the same time, hereinafter referred to as “the result of the supplementary evaluation of the first instance court.”

Even if we look at the Plaintiff’s assertion, the first instance court’s decision rejecting the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable.

Therefore, the reasoning for this Court regarding this case is as follows: (a) the court’s amendment of the first instance court’s “209” of the 3th judgment to “2008”; and (b) the reasoning for the first instance judgment is as stated in Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the addition of the judgment on the assertion emphasized by the Plaintiff in the trial as follows.

2. Determination on addition

A. In comparison with the Plaintiff’s physical examination records as of December 23, 201 and the physical examination records as of October 9, 201, the Plaintiff claimed by the trial court, compared with the Plaintiff’s assertion that it had been emphasized by the trial, the gross typhoid value and the tega dial dial dial dial dial dial dial dial dial dial dial dial dial dial dial dial dial dial dial dial dial dial dal

The Plaintiff is unable to take a sufficient rest for treatment during the above period where the Plaintiff’s inter-party function rapidly aggravated, and rather continues to engage in excessive work, resulting in the accumulation of overwork and stress, which led to rapid aggravation of hepatitis B above natural progress and resulting in the injury to the instant injury.

Therefore, since there is a proximate causal link between the Plaintiff’s overwork, stress and the injury and disease of this case, the instant disposition is unlawful.

B. Determination 1 chronic viruss.