Punishment of the defendant shall be 6,00,000 won.

If a fine is not paid, the period of 10,000 won shall be calculated as one day.

Punishment of the crime

around August 2015, the Defendant did not witness the site where D, a lessor of a commercial building, terminated the lease contract with E, a lessee and returned the lease deposit in the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government commercial building A and 10-4 commercial building.

On June 22, 2016, around 15:15, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the Seoul Northern District Court No. 202, Seoul Northern District Court No. 2016 and 155, which was located in 749, Seoul Dobong-gu, Seoul, Seoul, as a witness.

The Defendant, at that place, “I are going to do so today? I will good if I do so.”

Therefore, I would like to go together with this.

However, I have examined the post of cancellation on that day.

“I have compliedd in the next place with all the day and with the contract received.”

" and the shape of returning the deposits" shall be required.

However, it can be said that the deposit will be returned to Amama, and it will be the same time.

The testimony was made as follows: “We need to pay these money in an envelope and show the envelope,” and “We need to do so.”

The Defendant testified differently from his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant's oral statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with respect to E and D;

1. Copies of police statements made to E, F, and G;

1. Application of investigation reports (Comparison and Analysis of Details of Account Transactions in the name of E or D) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Code of the relevant Article on criminal facts [In comparison with the defendant's testimony and the statements of other participants, such as E, transaction details between D and E, and proof of transaction details, it is deemed that the defendant made a false testimony by pretending that he/she intentionally experienced and memorys for the situation in which he/she was unable to experience in D]

[Judgment of the court below]

The nature of the crime is bad by making a false statement about the question that confirms again with the doubt that the testimony is false.

Long-term criminal history.