The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, although the Defendant did not inflict an injury on the victim on the ground of a shouldered softener disease, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion

2. Determination

A. At around 04:30 on 06.07. 06. 06. 06., the Defendant: (a) was aware of the fact that he had been dissatisfied with the E convenience store in Ulsan-gu, U.S., and the E-mail Victim F (F, South and 30 years old); (b) the Defendant tried not to receive the death of the victim; (c) cut the plastic table, which was located at that place; (d) cut off the plastic table; and (e) then, the small-scale disease on the table was broken, a dangerous object, putting the small-scale disease of the victim facing the table on his hand at one time, putting about two weeks of treatment to the victim; and (e) put the open top of the part that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

B. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined at the court below and the court below: ① the defendant and G investigative agency and the court below's order are consistent with the specific and major part; ② the employee H of convenience store at the time of the instant case also stated that he was a person threatened with the shoulderer disease at the time of the instant case (the defendant asserted that he was unable to believe H's police statement because he did not know that he was a person threatened with the CCTV at the time of telephone conversations with him or was not well aware of the situation at the time; however, H made a passive answer to the fact that he was able to keep the defendant by telephone, and even according to the record of the record, only the defendant was aware of the police station, and even if it was based on the record, the victim respondeded to the victim's answer to the instant case at the time of the instant case