The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A (n, 59 years old) is between the victim B (n, 53 years old) and the matriarche.

On September 19, 2016, around 19:20, the Defendant sought in the state of alcohol in the “D” dan operated by the victim.

The Defendant, without any reason, laid the shots on the main-point calculation unit by gathering the shots on the floor by hand, and broken the shots on the floor by exposing two parts of the shots on the floor.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the utility of the property which was not owned by the victim by destroying the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (Attachment of site photographs of this case);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 366 (Selection of Penalty Penalty)

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence (the conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing as set forth below) recognizes and reflects the crime of this case; Defendant has no record of criminal punishment except for a long term fine; Defendant does not have substantial physical damage due to the crime of this case; Defendant does not want the punishment of Defendant; and Defendant does not want the punishment; Defendant’s relation with the victim, etc. shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the sentencing conditions as set forth in the instant case.