A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2019 Highest 1058] On February 14, 2019, the Defendant reported 112 on the ground that her mother was found in front of the Daegu Suwon-gu Ba on the front side of the road, and received the report and used it to Do on the ground that the police officers belonging to the Daegu Suwon-gu Police Station C Zone D, who were called the Defendant to refrain from her lavering, without permission, on the ground that the police officers belonging to the Daegu Suwon-gu Police Station C Zone D, who were called into the above laver, she spited D, and assaulted D, such as spitation.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of police officers' lives, bodies and property, prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

[2019 Highest 288] On February 3, 2019, around 09:07, the Defendant destroyed the said car with the repair cost of KRW 1,082,508, such as cutting off, cutting off, and cutting off, which is the part of the victim F, the victim F, parked in the place.

Summary of Evidence

[2019 Highest 1058]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Each statement of H and I prepared;

1. Photographs photographs of victims;

1. Service log for police officers (2019 Highest 2888);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Trabbbbox photographs to cut down the course;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing performance of official duties, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of destroying and damaging property and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Considering that the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act include a large number of criminal records against the defendant, the fact that the victim F did not take any measures to recover any particular damage, etc., considering the factors for sentencing that are favorable to the defendant, considering the fact that all the defendants have led to a crime, the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties is relatively small, the degree of crime exceeding the fine is not excessive, the fact that there is no criminal record exceeding the fine, and the fact that