All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the defendant is too unreasonable in light of the various sentencing conditions in this case (the disclosure and notification of personal information between two years and three years, and the completion of sexual assault treatment programs for 40 hours).

In full view of the following facts: (a) the victim misunderstanding the facts of the prosecutor (related to the part not guilty in the reasoning of quasi-rape in the judgment of the court below) made a relatively clear statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court below on the Defendant’s sexual insertingion; (b) the victim’s panty discovered DNA in the victim’s panty; and (c) the victim’s bucks and suckbucks discovered a hole of the size of the cash; and (d) the Defendant had sexual intercourse with the victim in a state of mental or physical loss or resistance,

Nevertheless, the court below rendered a not guilty verdict on the charge of quasi-rape of this case, which is the primary charge, and found the charge of quasi-rape of this case guilty. The court below erred by misapprehending the facts and thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

In light of the various sentencing conditions in this case, the sentence sentenced by the court below is too unfortunate and unfair.

Judgment

검사의 사실 오인 주장에 대하여( 원심 판시 준강간의 점 이유 무죄 부분 관련) 이 부분 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 2016. 12. 16. 22:30 경 대구 중구 D에 있는 E 주점에서 술을 마시던 중 술에 취한 피해자 F( 가명, 여, 24세) 을 발견하고 강간하기로 마음먹고, 같은 달 17. 00:15 경 같은 구 G에 있는 H 모텔로 술에 취해 정신을 잃은 피해자를 부축하여 데리고 간 다음, 00:20 경 위 모텔 801호에서 입으로 피해자의 음부, 가슴을 핥고, 자신의 성기를 피해 자의 입에 넣고, 손가락을 피해자의 음부에 넣고 피해자를 1회 간음하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant has sexual intercourse with the victim who is in a state of mental or physical loss or resistance.