1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, at a height of 2 meters from the industrial accident, performed a surgery by the alley of the alley, which occurred due to the industrial accident falling at a height of 194, and undergone a re-operation in around 1995, and was diagnosed by the anti-scopic assistant principal, a new scopic certificate, and received treatment from B hospitals and C hospitals from around 2009.

B. On December 6, 2010, the Plaintiff received first medical treatment in the department of medical treatment with Defendant anesthesia, and was subject to two times as of December 16, 2010 and December 23, 2010.

2. Where it is currently under hospital treatment, and it is impossible to find a job due to a disease, the medical reasons therefor shall be described in detail in detail.

There is no way to objectively prove the receipt.

Therefore, the restrictions on activities by pains are bound to be judged entirely dependent on the patient's horses.

However, it seems that the walking has no big obstacle.

3. Other reference samples shall be presented to the State.

At present, the center is being treated according to the diagnosis and opinion of the hospital (C hospital), which had been in the center, and it is difficult to judge the patient's accurate condition or the case of the sick.

C. On January 3, 2011, D’s doctors affiliated with the Defendant prepared and sent to the Daejeon Daejeon District Headquarters of the Korea Labor Welfare & Welfare Service a written opinion inquiry on the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant opinion inquiry”). The key contents are as follows.

On May 25, 2011, the Daejeon Regional Headquarters of the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service held an advisory society to deliberate on whether to fix the symptoms of the Plaintiff. At the time, the Plaintiff’s main doctor presented his opinion that “from June 1, 2011 to September 1, 2011, the Plaintiff’s application for a 14-day medical treatment plan” with the fluencing fluor through the fluencing bridge, but the advisory doctor’s meeting was subject to the fluencing flusium, and the symptoms are fixed because there was no change in special external dogs

6. It is reasonable to terminate treatment after treatment until 30.

‘The Committee has deliberated as ‘'.

[Reasons for Recognition]