Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 6, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 13:05 on February 13:05, the Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 1st floor “D” shop shop entrance entrance, and (b) decided to abolish the strings collected by the victim E (54 years old); (c) but (d) demanded that the strings be moved into the said string shop store as the Defendant refused from the victim.

While the Defendant is in the process of carrying out malicious packaging duties for the purpose of sending home-to-door distribution, the Defendant’s failure to comply with the Defendant’s request to leave the store to change the paper room, and the C commercial security guards, which had been buried in the store upon the victim’s request for help, are different.

In spite of the demand, the police officer called out after receiving the 112 report does not move back to the floor, and the police officer called out after receiving the 112 report.

말하자, 경찰관들에게 “ 짭새 새끼들이 무더기로 와서 위압감을 주네, 난 절대 안 나갈 꺼니 까 체포하던지 해라.

신분증을 못 준다 짭새 새끼들 아. ”라고 욕설을 하며 상의를 모두 벗어 던지는 등 약 25분 동안 위력을 행사하여 위 매장으로 들어오려는 손님들이 못 들어오게 하는 등으로 피해자의 악기 판매점 업무를 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Obstruction photographs of A business affairs;

1. One copy of a photograph of a CCTV screen to be cut on the main surface of the CCTV;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTV images storage;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order does not appear to have a genuine attitude against the Defendant, as the Defendant did not memory the criminal facts. However, the instant crime as a person with a disability of class 6 in the brain disease seems to have occurred contingently due to the Defendant’s mental illness, and there is a possibility that memory may be unclear due to the above disease.